Ex-CIA Officer Sentenced to 40 Years for Wikileaks Leak and Child Abuse Charges

Ex-CIA officer Joshua Schulte sentenced to 40 years for leaking “Vault 7” hacking tools to Wikileaks in 2017. Accused of damaging CIA’s ability and endangering personnel. Convicted of espionage, hacking, false statements, and child abuse image possession. Prosecutors claim it’s one of the most brazen leaks in U.S. history, costing CIA millions.

The Central Intelligence Agency logo is displayed in the lobby of CIA Headquarters in Langley, Virginia. Saul Loeb/AFP/Getty Images
The Central Intelligence Agency logo is displayed in the lobby of CIA Headquarters in Langley, Virginia. Saul Loeb/AFP/Getty Images

Former CIA Officer Sentenced to 40 Years for Espionage and Child Abuse Charges

Joshua Schulte, a former CIA officer, has been handed a 40-year prison sentence for leaking classified hacking tools to Wikileaks and possessing child abuse images. The sentencing, based on charges of espionage, computer hacking, contempt of court, making false statements to the FBI, and possession of child abuse images, comes after Schulte’s denial of the allegations.

CIA’s “Vault 7” Tools Leaked in Largest Data Breach

Schulte, 35, a former software developer in the Center for Cyber Intelligence, was accused of leaking the CIA’s “Vault 7” tools, which enable intelligence officers to hack smartphones and use them for surveillance purposes. Prosecutors labeled this act as one of the most “brazen” breaches in U.S. history. The leak, involving 8,761 documents shared with Wikileaks in 2017, is deemed the largest data breach in the CIA’s history.

Motivated by Workplace Dispute: Revenge and Damage to National Security

During the trials held in 2020, 2022, and 2023, evidence suggested that Schulte, working in the Center for Cyber Intelligence, transmitted stolen information to Wikileaks in 2016. Prosecutors argued that his motivation stemmed from a workplace dispute, where he sought revenge against those he perceived as wronging him. They claimed that this act of revenge caused significant damage to the country’s national security, impacting the CIA’s ability to gather foreign intelligence.

Damage Assessment: CIA’s Operational Compromises and Financial Losses

Prosecutors highlighted that the leak immediately and profoundly damaged the CIA’s capabilities, compromising its ability to collect foreign intelligence against adversaries. CIA personnel, programs, and assets were put at direct risk, resulting in hundreds of millions of dollars in losses. The breach, according to the justice department, inflicted severe consequences on the nation’s security apparatus.

Schulte’s Attempt to Conceal Responsibility and Further Leaks

Following the publication of the leaked data by Wikileaks in 2017, the FBI interviewed Schulte multiple times, during which he consistently denied responsibility. However, a search of his apartment uncovered tens of thousands of images of child sexual abuse materials. Furthermore, after his arrest in 2018, Schulte attempted to transmit more information by smuggling a phone into jail. He tried to send a reporter details about CIA cyber groups and drafted tweets under the name Jason Bourne, a fictional intelligence operative.

US Attorney’s Statement: Betrayal of Country

US Attorney Damian Williams stated, “Joshua Schulte betrayed his country by committing some of the most brazen, heinous crimes of espionage in American history.” The severity of the charges reflects the perceived magnitude of Schulte’s actions and their impact on national security.

With Schulte held behind bars since 2018, the sentencing represents the culmination of a legal process that exposed the former CIA officer’s involvement in leaking sensitive information and possessing illicit materials. The case underscores the challenges faced by intelligence agencies in maintaining the security of classified data and the legal consequences for those who compromise national security.

Google News Icon

Add Slash Insider to your Google News Feed

The information above is curated from reliable sources and modified for clarity. Slash Insider is not responsible for its completeness or accuracy. We strive to deliver reliable articles but encourage readers to verify details independently.